|
|
美律所对柯莱特发起诉讼 称存误导和虚假披露
imeigu.com 2012-01-06 08:14:14 来源： i美股 原文链接
（i美股讯）北京时间1月6日消息，美国律所Robbins Geller Rudman Dowd LLP将对柯莱特发起集体诉讼，认为其在2010年6月首次公开募股和12月的二次发行中，在招股书等文件中对团队和业务等都存在虚假和误导性披露。
该律所认为，正是由于这些不正确表述，导致柯莱特股价在上述时间段内出现虚高，并在2011年1月11日一度达到26.73美元的高位。此后在2011年8月15日，Seeking Alpha发文质疑了柯莱特公司业务的几个重要因素，柯莱特股价应声跌至9美元以下；8月18日，柯莱特调低2011年预期，当天股价继续跌至6.32美元。
以下是柯莱特被指披露不到位的几点：
a) 公司的技术团队并无竞争优势，并且其中很多人对公司不满，对维系客户带来负面影响；
b) 公司内部存在员工矛盾，且未对外披露，可能影响其吸引新客户的能力；
c) 公司并非像自身描述的那样，拥有大量受到良好培训的技术专家；
d) 公司与其最重要的客户IBM的关系，也并非所宣称的那样稳固，同时也不可能再以相同的条件续签合同。
-----------------------------另据了解，天阳宏业 为 科莱特集团子公司。
英文报导 http://www.businesswire.com/news ... owd-LLP-Files-Class
http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-camelot.html
路透社 http://cn.reuters.com/article/pr ... 120105?symbol=CIS.N
January 05, 2012 06:29 PM Eastern Time
Robbins Geller Rudman Dowd LLP Files Class Action Suit against Camelot Information Systems Inc.
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Robbins Geller Rudman Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”) (http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/camelot/) today announced that a class action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Camelot Information Systems Inc. (“Camelot”) (NYSE:CIS) American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) between July 21, 2010 and August 17, 2011 (the “Class Period”), including those who acquired Camelot ADSs pursuant or traceable to the Company’s false and misleading Registration Statements and Prospectuses issued in connection with its July 21, 2010 initial public offering (“IPO”) and December 10, 2010 Secondary Offering (“Secondary Offering”) (collectively, the “Offerings”).
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiff’s counsel, Darren Robbins of Robbins Geller at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058, or via e-mail at djr@rgrdlaw.com. If you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as filed or join this class action online at http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/camelot/. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.
The complaint charges Camelot, certain of its officers and directors and the underwriters of the Offerings with violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Camelot is a holding company that conducts business through its operating subsidiaries in China. The Company is a provider of enterprise application services and financial industry information technology (“IT”) services in China.
The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business practices and financial results. Specifically, defendants failed to disclose negative trends in Camelot’s business, including with Camelot’s most important customers. As a result of defendants’ false statements, Camelot ADSs traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching a high of $26.73 per share on January 11, 2011.
On July 21, 2010, Camelot announced the pricing of its IPO of 13.3 million ADSs at $11.00 per ADS. Subsequently, on December 9, 2010, Camelot announced the pricing of its Secondary Offering of 7,160,206 ADSs by selling shareholders at $19.50 per ADS. The complaint alleges that the Registration Statements issued in connection with the Offerings were inaccurate and misleading and omitted to state material facts required to be stated therein.
On August 15, 2011, Seeking Alpha published an article questioning several key components of Camelot’s business. This caused Camelot’s ADSs to drop to below $9 per share. Then on August 18, 2011, Camelot issued a press release announcing its second quarter 2011 unaudited financial results, including lower-than-expected guidance for fiscal 2011. On this news, Camelot’s ADSs dropped $2.24 per share to close at $6.32 per share on August 18, 2011, a one-day decline of 26%.
According to the complaint, the true facts, which were known by the defendants but concealed from the investing public during the Class Period, were as follows: (a) the Company’s IT professionals were not a competitive advantage to the Company and many were dissatisfied with Camelot, which would adversely affect Camelot’s ability to retain its customers; (b) the Company was suffering from undisclosed attrition of employees, which was having a negative impact on the Company’s ability to attract new customers; (c) Camelot did not have the large numbers of highly trained professionals at its disposal that it had represented; and (d) Camelot’s contract with its most important customer, IBM, was not as solid as represented, and would not be renewed on the same terms.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of Camelot ADSs during the Class Period, including purchasers in the IPO and Secondary Offering (the “Class”). The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.
Robbins Geller, a 180-lawyer firm with offices in San Diego, San Francisco, New York, Boca Raton, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia and Atlanta, is active in major litigations pending in federal and state courts throughout the United States and has taken a leading role in many important actions on behalf of defrauded investors, consumers, and companies, as well as victims of human rights violations. The Robbins Geller Web site (http://www.rgrdlaw.com) has more information about the firm.
Contacts
Robbins Geller
Darren Robbins, 800-449-4900 or 619-231-1058
djr@rgrdlaw.com
Recent Stories from Robbins Geller Rudman Dowd LLP
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------以下为对上文的google翻译，不一定信、达、雅，机器翻的，不过可以“科普一下”了。
2012年05月1日，06:29东部时间下午
：罗宾斯盖勒鲁德曼及多德律师事务所文件类对柯莱特信息系统公司的诉讼
圣迭戈- （ 美国商业资讯 ） -罗宾斯盖勒鲁德曼与多德LLP（“罗宾斯盖勒”）（ http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/camelot/ ）今天宣布已在美国展开集体诉讼美国纽约南区地方法院对购买柯莱特信息系统有限公司（简称“柯莱特”）（纽约证券交易所：独联体）的代表7月21日，2010年和2011年8月17日（美国存托股份（“存托凭证”）之间的“一类期”），包括那些谁收购柯莱特存托凭证根据或溯源到公司的虚假和误导性的登记声明和招股说明书在其7月21日颁布，2010初次公开发行（“新股”）和年12月10，二零一零年二次发售（ “二次发售”）（统称为“奉献”）。
如果你想担任首席原告，您必须将不迟于60天，从今天的法院。 如果你想讨论这个动作，或有任何问题，关于本通知或您的权利或利益，请联系原告的律师达伦·罗宾斯，罗宾斯盖勒在800/449-4900或619/231-1058，或通过电子邮件DJR @ rgrdlaw.com 。 如果你是这个类的一个成员，你可以查看作为提交一份投诉，或加入这个一流的行动在线http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/camelot/的 。 假定类的任何成员可动议法院首席原告通过自己选择的律师服务，或可以选择什么也不做，保持缺席类成员。
申诉费柯莱特，一定的管理人员和董事及承销商违反1933年证券法“和1934年证券交易法的祭品。 柯莱特是一家控股公司通过其在中国经营的附属公司的业务进行。 本公司是一家提供企业应用服务和金融业信息技术（“资讯科技”）在中国的服务。
指控类期间，被告发出有关公司的商业惯例和财务业绩的重大虚假和误导性陈述。 具体来说，被告没有透露消极趋势在柯莱特的业务，包括与柯莱特最重要的客户。 作为被告的虚假陈述的结果，柯莱特存托凭证交易类期间在人为地抬高价格，达到2011年1月11日，每股26.73美元的高位。
2010年7月21日，柯莱特宣布，其首次公开发行1330万托存股份的定价为每股美国存托凭证11.00美元。 随后，2010年12月9日，柯莱特宣布其7160206托存股份的二次发售的定价，由销售股东在每股美国存托凭证19.50美元。 投诉称，注册祭发表声明是不准确和误导，省略国家所需材料内所述事实。
2011年08月15日， 寻求阿尔法发表文章质疑的几个关键组件柯莱特的业务。 这引起了柯莱特的ADSS跌破每股9美元。 然后，2011年8月18日，柯莱特发布的一份新闻稿，宣布其2011第二季度未经审计财务业绩，包括低于预期的2011财年的指导。 在此消息，柯莱特的托存股份跌至每股2.24美元，收于每股6.32美元，2011年8月18日，26％的单日跌幅。
根据指控，，真正的事实，这被称为被告，但投资大众隐瞒类期内，分别如下：（一）本公司的IT专业人员没有竞争优势本公司和许多被不满与柯莱特，这将造成不利影响卡米洛特的保留其客户的能力;（二）本公司是从员工，这是有该公司吸引新客户的能力产生负面影响的未公开的流失痛苦;（三）柯莱特也不能有大数，它代表在其处置训练有素的专业人员;及（d）卡米洛特的合同是其最重要的客户，IBM公司，不作为固体为代表，并不会相同条款续约。
原告寻求恢复对代表卡米洛存托凭证所有购买的损害赔偿类期间，包括在首次公开招股和二次发售（“类”）的买家。 原告代表由罗宾斯盖勒，其中有专长起诉的投资者集体诉讼和丰富经验，在涉及金融欺诈的行动。
罗宾斯盖勒，与180律师事务所在博卡拉顿，纽约，旧金山，圣迭戈，华盛顿特区，费城和亚特兰大设有办事处，是活跃在美国联邦法院和州法院未决的重大诉讼，并采取了代表欺骗投资者，消费者和公司，以及侵犯人权行为的受害者，许多重要的行动中发挥主导作用。 罗宾斯的盖勒网站（ http://www.rgrdlaw.com ）有关公司的更多信息。
往来
罗宾斯盖勒
达伦·罗宾斯，800-449-4900或619-231-1058
djr@rgrdlaw.com
好像那个金融资讯公司也难产了吧？
这种公司先不说本省竞争力如何，内部执行力首先就是一个问题
62146 发表于 2012-3-5 13:12
原来真有这个新闻 ：
美律所对柯莱特发起诉讼 称存误导和虚假披露
imeigu.com 2012-01-06 08:14:14 ...
百硕，赞同，银丰都是柯莱特集团的
huaqiao2012 发表于 2012-3-5 16:06
百硕，赞同，银丰都是柯莱特集团的
还有天阳宏业
chassis 发表于 2012-3-15 13:46
瘦死的兔子还赶不上耗子
中国金融IT公司悲剧 |
|
发表于 2022-9-11 08:01:05
发表于 2025-7-6 05:11:27
